The role of parents in the schooling process is of growing significance. Not just in the educational games and toys
used at home but also in the make-up of the family. There are
similarities between the UK and USA where a detailed research project
has just been completed. The following extract is published in
cooperation with keen2learn and the the author Christine Kim (photographed right) of
the Heritage Foundation. September 22nd 2008.
Christine is a Policy Analyst, with the Heritage Foundation in the
USA. Founded in 1973, The Heritage Foundation is a research and
educational institute - a think tank - whose mission is to formulate
and promote conservative public policies based on the principles of
free enterprise, limited government, individual freedom.
American taxpayers invest heavily in education. Last year, spending
on public K–12 education totalled $553 billion, about 4 percent of
gross domestic product (GDP) in 2006. For each child enrolled in a
public elementary or secondary school, expenditures averaged $9,266
that year—an increase of 128 percent, adjusted for inflation, since
1970.
Despite this increase in public spending, student achievement and
educational attainment over the last four decades has remained
relatively flat. In 2007, a significant portion of students,
disproportionately from disadvantaged backgrounds, scored “below basic”
in reading and maths on the National Assessment of Educational Progress
(NAEP). Sadly, in many of the nation’s largest cities, fewer than half
of high school students graduate.
While academic research has consistently shown that increased
spending does not correlate with educational gains, the research does
show a strong relationship between parental influences and children’s
educational outcomes, from school readiness to college completion. Two
compelling parental factors emerge:
1. Family structure, i.e., the number of parents living in the student’s home and their relationships to the child, and
2. Parents’ involvement in their children’s schoolwork.
Consequently, the solution to improving educational outcomes begins
at home, by strengthening marriage and promoting stable family
formation and parental involvement.
The Erosion of Family Stability in America
“Perhaps the most profound change in the American family over the
past four decades,” writes sociologist Paul Amato, “has been the
decline in the share of children growing up in households with
biological parents.” In 1960, 88 percent of all children lived with
two parents, compared to 68 percent in 2007. In 1960, 5 percent of all
children were born to unmarried mothers. That figure rose to 38.5
percent in 2006. Demographers have estimated that, overall, one child
in two will spend some portion of his or her childhood in a
single-parent family.
Studies show that children raised in intact families, i.e., with two
continuously married parents, tend to fare better on a number of
cognitive, emotional, and behavioural outcomes than children living in
other family forms. Not surprisingly, the changes in family structure
over the last 40 years have affected child and adolescent well-being.
In 2002, nearly 7 million children between the ages of 12 and 18
repeated a grade. Based on this figure, Professor Amato estimates that
if the share of two-parent families had remained unchanged between 1980
and 2002, some 300,000 fewer teens would have repeated a grade. Some
750,000 fewer students in 2002 would have repeated a grade if the share
of two-parent families remained at the level it was in 1960.
Social science research over the past decades suggests that family
structure affects children’s school outcomes, from preschool to
college. Some of the variations in school performance could be
explained, in part or in whole, by the differences in family resources
such as time and money, family dynamics and parental characteristics
that are associated with the various family forms. These are mediating
factors, or mechanisms through which family structure affects schooling
outcomes. Family structure may also exert a direct influence,
independent of mediating factors. Thus, depending on the outcome,
family structure’s total effect may consist of one or more mediating
influences or a combination of both direct and mediating influences.
Though various methodological research issues— e.g., data quality,
inconsistent definitions of family structure, the selection effect
(e.g., are individuals who possess better parenting qualities more
likely to choose marriage and stay married, or does marriage per se
bolster children’s well-being?)—limit the findings, the evidence,
nonetheless, is strong: Family structure matters.
School Readiness. A number of early-childhood outcomes contribute to
children’s eventual school readiness. The evidence suggests that
potentially important early-childhood outcomes vary by family
structure. One study, analyzing 1,370 mothers in the Fragile Families
and Child Wellbeing Study who were continuously married or in
cohabiting relationships from the child’s birth to age three, found
that three-year-olds born to cohabiting mothers tended to exhibit more
aggressive, withdrawn, and anxious or depressive behaviour than
children born to married mothers. For aggressive and withdrawn
behaviours’, the association was explained by income differences. For
anxiety and depressive symptoms, even controlling for income, the
cohabitation effect remained.
Parental Involvement
Parental involvement emerges as another robust influence on
educational outcomes. It is multi-dimensional. Examples include
monitoring children’s activities outside home and school; setting
rules; having conversations about and helping children with school work
and school-related issues; holding high educational expectations;
discussing future planning with children and helping them with
important decision making; participating in school-related activities
such as meeting with teachers and volunteering in the classroom; and
reading to children or engaging in other enrichment or leisure
activities together.
A meta-analysis of 77 studies, consisting of 300,000 elementary and
secondary students, found that parental educational expectations are a
particularly important aspect of parental involvement. Parenting style,
reading to children, and, to a lesser extent, participation in
school-related activities appeared to be influential as well.
Furthermore, parental involvement is associated with multiple measures
of student achievement, for the entire student population as well as
for minority and low-income student populations. Overall, “the academic
advantage for those parents who were highly involved in their education
averaged about 0.5–0.6 of a standard deviation for overall educational
outcomes, grades and academic achievement.”
Parental Involvement and Family Structure.
The level of parental involvement varies by family structure, and
the relationship between parental involvement and educational outcomes
depends on the family context as well. One study, for example, found
that compared to high school students from intact families, those from
single or stepparent families reported less parental involvement in
their school work, supervision, and parental educational expectations,
which, in turn, affected school outcomes.
Studies show that reading to young children aids their literacy
development. Toddlers and preschool-age children in married-parent
families are read to more often than peers in non-intact families. One
study of 11,500 kindergartners living with two parents or parent
figures reported that, accounting for parental education and income,
children living with married parents averaged higher reading
achievement test scores than peers living in cohabiting or step-parent
families.
To read the full report see http://www.heritage.org/Research/Education/bg2185.cfm
Recent Comments